Tuesday, September 21, 2004

 
On "Rathergate"...  Derrick, don't count on your profession cleaning up its act any time soon. Take a look at Jim Romenesko's blog at Poynter, and see the shockingly blase attitude among journalists who write into the letters section:
 
From Emerson College journalism professor Donna Halper:
Okay fine, he made a serious error in judgement, but hey, this ain't Watergate, this ain't the worst thing that ever happened [sic]. I find it more puzzling that few journalists attack the very pronounced right-wing bias of a network like Fox, which any media critic will admit is far from "fair and balanced" and, to cite one recent example, treated the Swift Boat claims as true for far too long.
 
But that having been said, why are we obsessing about Rather? The Washington Post did a front page story yesterday about how over 1800 protesters (and a few non-protesters who were caught up by the police erroneously) were held incommunicado for 48 hours with no phone call and no access to lawyers. Whether one is right wing or left wing, this is the kind of story the media should have been all over -- I mean, they were THERE yet when the police and the mayor said everything was fine and the streets were safe, nobody checked it out to see if people were being deprived of their civil liberties. And how come Iraq and Afghanistan are not at the top of people's minds -- could it be because we are busy covering Mr. Rather (and previously whether Mr. Kerry deserved his medals) instead of stories that affect the lives of Americans?
 
I have a few issues with her letter, as she finds it disgusting what the Swift Boat Vets did, but doesn't say a damn thing about Texans for Truth (the people behind the memos). She says no media type attack the bias of Fox News, which proves she must be living in a broom closet. And then she says this front page story in the Washington Post ... repeat after me FRONT PAGE STORY WASHINGTON POST... is evidence of media covering police brutality up. (perhaps much like this story). And Iraq, Afghanistan and the threat of terrorism NOT at the top of people's minds? Where has she been?
 
Anyway, her attitude is simple: to hell with a major fraud by what used to be the gold standard of television news (a year after we discovered Jayson Blair, who perpetuated the most major fraud in journalistic history at what used to be the gold standard of journalism, period.)
 
And then consider the dispatch from Bill Hendricks:
 
Wonder if the same source that told President Bush there was WMD in Iraq also provided Dan Rather with the disputed National Guard documents. Thankfully it's unlikely that several hundred American soldiers and thousands of others will die  before we know whether the Rather documents were forged.
Again, ho hum CBS, but shame on the president for having faulty intelligence on Saddam Hussein (I'd suggest you read this thoughtful letter to National Review writer Jonah Goldberg).
 
If you believe that Iraq was the biggest crime the U.S. ever committed and Bush is a draft-dodging cocaine-using chickenhawk war monger, does the CBS blunder change your opinion of Bush? Probably not (although I'd argue many of those adjectives used to describe Bush are based on out-and-out lies or exaggerations. But can't even the most vitriolic Bush hater accept that Dan Rather seriously wounded his credibility and in turn the credibility of CBS News, television news, and journalism at large?
 
Unfortunately, we're seeing that the mainstream media is blinded by its own biases and unable to admit even the most obvious, colossal blunder.

Comments:
Nice site!
[url=http://rrqcifaj.com/owjl/razr.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://gehwhduk.com/natk/kvek.html]Cool site[/url]
 
Good design!
My homepage | Please visit
 
Great work!
http://rrqcifaj.com/owjl/razr.html | http://ybppdebd.com/wmmz/srlq.html
 
Post a Comment << Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com